0230 GMT March 31, 2006
UN Asks Dutch To Host Liberian Dictator Trial The Dutch have basically agreed, some minor details need to be worked out. The Hague represents the best of all outcomes for Mr. Charles Taylor, but he cannot look forward to a comfortable life in jail: one Dutch condition is that he leaves Netherlands after the trial. Also, we assume any trial in the Netherlands has to be a non-death penalty affair.
Israel's Kadima Says It Has 61 Coalition Seats with 3 parties joining it to bid to form the next government. Looks like a recipe for disaster to us, though there seems to be widespread support for Kadima's main plank, a unilateral rearrangement of settlements in the West Bank. The plan is to abandon difficult to defend settlements and protect the rest with the wall solution that has worked in Gaza.
Pro-Russia Party Leads in Ukraine with 93% of the vote counted. The party has 31% of the vote.
Nonetheless, a coalition of liberals say they have sufficient seats to make a bid to form the new government.
More Fighting Feared In Somalia according to Middle East Online. The Islamic and warlord militias are observing a ceasefire, but talks are not proceeding because, Cape Times says, the warlords have refused to attend.
The clashes began over a push by both sides for economic, military, and political control.
Cape Times says Islamic militias fear the warlords are rearming for a new round, and say that the Somalia Minister of Defense has arranged fresh arms shipments to them.
Middle East Online quotes a local diplomat as saying the locals favor the Islamic militias because the taxes they charge are lower and law-and-order is better. Others, however, say the Islamic courts are dominated by clan and sub-clan politics.
0230 GMT March 30, 2006
It's a Miracle! Liberian Dictator Suddenly Found! He was trying to board a plane out of Nigeria! He has been arrested and sent to the UN Tribunal in Sierra Leone!
So there you have, in a nutshell, the best reason to avoid bribing people. They don't stay bribed. Mr. Charles Taylor was paying off everyone from top down, including his Nigerian security detail. But when Ms. Rice expressed her displeasure, the President of Nigeria suddenly "found" the "lost" Mr. Taylor.
The Problem with Moussaui's Confession is apparently that anyone associated with 9/11 is saying he wasn't part of the plot, he was a super pain in the baatootie, wouldn't follow instructions, couldn't pilot a 747, and boasted non-stop about how important he was.
So it looks like his confession that he was to fly the plane into the White House seems just another attempt to get attention.
No matter. He's saying he was part of the plot, he says he's confessing voluntarily, the looney-doctors have ruled him sane, why should the jury refuse to believe him? He says he wants to die; Americans are kind and generous at heart, they should grant him his wish.
UN Security Council Orders Iran To Stop Enrichment In 30-days Or Else...or else what? That's the problem. The Russians and Chinese signed on to the declaration, but the Russians keep saying force is not the answer, diplomacy and peaceful talks are.
Okay, Comrades. We believe you. Care to apply the same formula in Chechnya? Obviously not, and we back you 100% for using force in Chechnya because negotiations and diplomacy didn't work. And you know they won't work with Iran either.
Waiting Bush Out Mike Thompson sent us a fascinating analysis from the Wall Street Journal (our email is out so we cant give the exact reference). The analysis says one reason people in Iraq, Syria, Iran, North Korea etc etc are hanging tough is because they figure US foreign policy as related to the axis of evil and spread of democracy is just a fad pushed by Mr. Bush. When he's out, they feel it'll be business as usual.
One can understand this line of reasoning, but it has a corollary. If Mr. Bush believes when he leaves office his successor will drastically change course, he may well decide he has to do what he has to do before Inauguration Day 2009 because that's the last chance to push his agenda forward.
So we could argue, using the same evidence, that the next 2 1/2 years are a very high risk period for the bad guys, and they should, at the minimum, be making kiss-kiss sounds, not waiting him out.
32 Taliban, 2 Allied Troops Killed in Afghanistan after the insurgents attack an Allied base. Air support was called in. 12 Taliban died in the initial attack, says Jang of Pakistan; 20 when the remainder fled.
One really has to wonder what is it with these insurgents? Have they no mind? Attacking an allied base? Anyway, the fighting was in Helmand province. 32 less Taliban for the British to take care of when they arrive.
Pakistan Terror Group Leader Abducted, Beaten A very peculiar story, but BBC also carries it. The leader of a Pakistan terror group was abducted by 8 men while at prayers near the capital, badly beaten, and then dumped by the roadside. He is in critical condition.
We don't understand why his abductors didn't kill him. Someone sending a message because of a wrong the terror leader did to them? But why take a chance by letting him live?
Iran To Stage "Massive" Naval Maneuvers says Xinhua of China quoting Iran sources. The coast defense exercises involving 1500 vessels and 17,000 soldiers will take place from March 31-April 6.
We've been waiting for the announcement and are heartened. Right now, as far as we are concerned, the worst thing that can happen is the Iranians become reasonable. We aren't concerned with their bogus N-program, but with their intervention in Iraq; that's the reason their current leaders have to be put down. The maneuvers raise the temperature, something that is needed to keep the pot boiling. This is to be an IRGC exercise - the regular forces are not involved. Interesting.
0230 GMT March 29, 2006
0230 GMT March 28, 2006
|
|
|
0230 GMT March 27, 2006
US/Iraqi Forces Attack Sadr Militia The US says Iraqi SF raided a mosque in Sadr City, with US support and 16 Sadr Militia - usually called the Mehdi Army in the press were killed with no US/Iraq losses.
Sadr people say the Americans did the fighting and 22 were killed.
Apparently the militia fired on US/Iraqi forces as the latter arrived at the mosque. US/Iraqi forces fired back, killing some gunmen. So with the logic that Sadr Militia is famous for and no one else understands, several militia ran out to engage the attackers and were killed.
One non-western hostage was rescued, an explosives cache was blown up on the scene.
Now, and this is interesting: some of the people killed were member of President Jaffari's political party. He is a Kurd, but he has been protecting the Sadr Militia in return for firepower. No Kurds are interested in coming to Baghdad to do the job for him, because they want independence.
Sadr has been wrecking havoc since the Samarra Mosque bombing, murdering Sunnis left and right, then telling them only he can protect them, and murdering more Sunnis.
Obviously someone high up has made a decision to take on Sadr. Being the overheated juvenile he is, he's unlikely to take this raid lying down. Interesting developments may lie ahead.
Many Marines Refusing Extra Armor says Associated Press, because they are already overburdened, going on foot patrols that last several hours with 60-70 pounds. The additional armor is adding 5-10 lbs. They say this reduces their mobility and the added weight can cause injuries. This is war and people are going to die, they say.
Some commanders have made the extra armor mandatory.
One Marine says the extra armor has been issued to make people back home feel safer. Issue it by all means, he says, but don't make it mandatory.
Baluchistan The usual: one Frontier Corps soldier and two insurgents killed in a firefight; a civilian killed when his motorcycle struck a land-mine; someone planted a bomb that damaged the wall of a house in Kuzdar District; someone else planted two bombs outside the residence of the Baluch Chief Minister (the senior-most provincial elected official); four bombs went off near Quetta Airport; security forces defused two land mines and so on.
PRC Spends More On Official Cars Than On Defense An odd assertion, but apparently it comes from China Daily, a state-owned newspaper, reports London Times. The spending on official cars, drivers, and fuel etc is given as UK Sterling 21-billion/year, versus 20-billion for defense.
We were skeptical till we saw the figure of 36 cars purchased for Sterling 337,000 in just one poor county of Human Province. The exchange rate today is USD 1.72 for one pound Sterling. That's $580,000 for this one poor county. China has 2000 counties. Then there are the provinces and the center. Then there are municipal bodies, government companies, academic institutions, sports organizations, police and so on and so forth.
So: who's to say - it might be possible.
Red Ken At It Yet Again After having told two Jewish developers who happen to hail from India to go back to Iran and see how they liked life under the ayatollahs - both a racist statement and a confused one, Red Ken, the Mayor of London, has again stuck his large foot in his large mouth, something quite easy for him to do.
He has likened a critic to a "Dr. Goebbels" who was "dancing on the memory of the Holocaust."
Er, Ken, if we may say a word here: Dr. Goebbels was anti-Jewish. You are anti-Jewish. Your critic attacked you for being anti-Jewish. That doesn't make him a Dr. Goebbels. It makes you a Dr. Goebbels. Get it?
Yo, our British homies...this is three times in less than a month Red Ken has made racist comments. In the US, had a politician of his importance made similar comments, refused to apologize, and gone on to make more racist comments, that person would be finished for good. But from what we hear, y'all don't seem at all bothered - that's why the Ken-O-Rama is getting away with this rot. So what gives, bros?
0230 GMT March 26, 2006
British ex-Hostage Thanks The Troops for rescuing him in Iraq. The hostages' silence on the issue was receiving comments, mainly unfavorable, in the world of blogs. The two Canadians have not said anything.
Iraq's Foreign Minister Criticizes Arabs for being slow to help Iraq. Its about time someone said it, and of course it has everything to do with Iraq being a Shia majority state whereas as most Arabs are Sunni.
Further, how many Arab states want Iraq to succeed? The more democracy becomes established in Iraq, the more the mostly non-democratic Arab states feel threatened.
Arabs Call For Foreign Troop Withdrawal So instead of helping Iraq, the 22-member Arab summit at Khartoum tells Iraq to quickly form a government of national unity and asks foreign troops to leave.
No offers on Arab troops to replace the foreign troops that should leave. A government of national unity will not stop the violence, because much of it is criminal and personal.
This pattern of useless yapping and no action is quite typical of the Arabs, but also, we are sorry to say, of the 3rd world in general.
Nigeria And Oil Statistics The problem with oil statistics, as one learns when one starts hanging out with them, is that ultimately no one seems to know what's going on. Case in point: Nigeria, which we have been following, and you can too - click the red hyperlink in the Energy Facts box in the left column.
One reason oil prices are said to be high is because of uncertainty in Nigeria, supposedly because it has half-a-million barrels/day not being produced due to insurgents. In this tight market, and also given Nigeria's crude is premium stuff, that would drive prices up.
Well, today we updated the Nigeria entry and we found that despite the lost production, Nigeria is producing above its OPEC quota. So why should prices be up because of the insurgents?
Japanese Water Consumption: The Law Of Unintended Consequences London Times says that the Japanese got so charged up about cutting water consumption - all part of the Kyoto Protocol 1997 deal - that Japanese water companies are raising prices on water by 20%. Huh? That was our first reaction too.
Turns out that the water companies' revenues have seriously fallen because of the enthusiasm to save water. Water, like most utilities, requires heavy long-term infrastructure investment; to make matters worse, during Japan's Pork Barrel Spending Years investments in water that were not needed were made, and now the interest payments have to be met on falling revenues.
So much for market economics. The Americans have a ridiculous ad slogan that goes "The More You Spend The More You Save", meaning the more you go into debt the bigger rebate you get, but it seems the slogan has finally found a home, in Japan, because the less water their people are spending the more they're paying.
Revisiting Pravda Once we found ITAR-Tass, the sort of official Russian news agency, we stopped reading Pravda. Today we looked at it again: "Humans learn to fly" (without machinery or other aids); "Will prostitution be legalized internationally"; "Buttocks Lifting Underwear Enjoys Immense Popularity In Japan"; "Japanese Sex Engineers Develop [Deleted] [Deleted]; other stuff in which most of the words will have to be deleted so readers will have no clue unless they go to www.pravda.ru That will take you to the Russian edition; look the top right for "EN" and that will take you to the English edition.
But one story resonated with us as deeply meaningful and true. A Russian man of 30 fell through ice and was in the water for 20 minutes. But he never let go of his bottle of vodka. This was truly inspirational.
We Haven't Been Reporting The Latest French Riots because its not a terribly interesting story. France is going down the tubes economically - unemployment in the under 30s is 20%, for example - and the government is making what to Americans will seem pathetically ineffectual attempts to "modernize" the economy. One "reform" is that any new worker can be fired with 2 years of hiring without cause. Right now you cannot fire even the most incompetent worker without a process so convoluted most employers don't bother - and they don't hiring either, one reason for the economic stagnation.
Upset with this "revolutionary" - we should say "reactionary" if we look at it from the French perspective proposal, French youngsters have been demonstrating.
Now, they have been quite peaceful. But it seems as if various gangs of youths have taken the opportunity to infiltrate the demonstrations and have been - surprise - burning cars and destroying shop fronts. Well, this has upset the French a great deal - partly because it's been happening not in the slums and such but near the Eiffel Tower.
We don't consider this much of a story because the great majority of demonstrators have behaved themselves and in their reasons to demonstrate, the French are being - well, the French. That's them, love 'em or hate 'em.
Someone did have an interesting statement the other day. They said in 1968 French youngsters were demonstrating because they wanted to change France. Things got pretty rough that year because the French riot police, the CRS, had to be called in, and this lot is trained to put down insurrection, not to use minimum force. But a generation later, French youngsters are demonstrating because they don't want France to change, at least in respect of its ultra-generous job protection and social-security system. Meanwhile, comments like this have the editor where the heck his youth went. Now he's gotten to the advanced age where he wonders: did he actually have a youth? Maybe its all a false memory.
Everyone conversant with Europe has stories like this: a college classmate of the just-run-away Mrs. Rikhye had a French parent, so she was entitled to migrate to France. She was in her very early 20s, a lovely young woman and smart too. She worked at a restaurant for a week until someone introduced her to Le Scam - we're trying to show we too are well educated and smart and have a great command of the French language. Next week she said she had hurt her arm on the job and proceeded to live for several years on disability that was greater than she was earning as a wage. That "years" is not a typo.
0230 GMT March 25, 2006
And The Country Supplying The Best Port Security Equipment Is ...you guessed it, the US. And the most advanced US container scanning equipment is deployed where? No penalty if you did not guess Hong Kong. And the most advanced US equipment is NOT deployed where? Right again, its not available in the US. And the company that will scan containers from the Bahamas to the US without a single American being present is...Okay, no penalty if you did not guess Hong Kong. And the company running the Hong Kong company has close ties to...Again, you're right: to China. And the US Congress is threatening to veto the deal...Well, no. US Congress could care less.
And the reason, according to Business Week, the US gives for not deploying the latest equipment in America is...No penalty again if you did not guess right, the answer is lack of money.
So obviously the equipment costs billions and billions, so that only the Chinese can afford it...Well, no. It would cost only $1.5 billion to equip US ports with the scanner.
And the US is spending on defense, including the war against terrorism, including spy agency budgets...that you got, we're sure, its close on $550-billion including spy budgets, regular US defense budget, and extra money for Iraq and Afghanistan; and at that the equipment that is being run down without replacement is not fully funded.
And after reading this story, our readers are...Confused. But advice from Orbat.com: Don't Worry, Be Happy. This is the way America is run these days, doesn't matter if its Democrats or Republicans doing it, they are all equally incompetent, doesn't matter what the issue is, you can be sure its going to be a Snafu.
And When the US Ran From Somalia We Knew that it would come to this: BBC reports that Mogadishu has seen the heaviest fighting in a decade these last three days, with 70 dead. The combatants? An Islamic militia and a new coalition formed by the businessmen warlords. The warlords say The militia is sheltering foreign fighters, has links to Al Qaeda, and is killing critics. Sounds just like Pakistan's North West Frontier Province.
Well, of course, if by the "we" we mean we - that Mr. Bill Clinton's influence on us, he's the president that got us out of Somalia - than we had no clue this was going to happen, at the time. Hadn't even heard the name "Al Qaeda", if it existed.
But a lot of people did say a broken country was going to be a problem for everyone, and certainly since about 1996 the world has known about AQ and Somalia.
We keep being told that we're involved in a GWOT - rhymes with Snot, and at Orbat.com we are firm supporters of the war. Our main gripe is the Administration made too many mistakes in Iraq and now we're not prosecuting the rest of the war adequately. But - we hope the Administration won't take this amiss - the G in GWOT stands for Global. As in, the whole world. Like, we have to pay attention to places like Somalia, forsaken as they may be. and however much it may hurt our heads to focus on them.
Danish Imam Says Death Threat Was a Joke A Muslim cleric who was one of the 12 who traveled from overseas from Denmark to stir up trouble over the Prophet cartoons was caught by a hidden camera saying of a Member of Parliament that if he became minister for immigration, shouldn't two men be sent to blow him and his ministry up? The cleric says it was only a joke.
The Danish Deputy Prime Minister has called for expulsion of radical clerics. Oddly, the MP who was threatened appears to have a Muslim name, though it needs keeping in mind many Mideast people are Christian.
Prayer Was Responsible For Hostage Rescue say the hostages and their friends. Publicly they have given not one word of thanks to their rescuers, though Times London says one hostage "privately" gave his thanks.
This reminds us of the rabbi who climbed up to the roof of his house to escape a big flood in Miami. He sent the first rescue boat away. "God will rescue me," he said confidently. Soon he was waist-deep in water, even on top of his roof. He sent the second rescue boat away. "God will rescue me," he said. Soon the water was to his neck. A third boat approached and was sent away in the same manner as the other two.
The water kept rising. Just before he went under, the rabbi looked to the heavens and berated God. "I prayed and I prayed," he cried, "and Lord, you just ignored me!"
A deep, rolling voice answers from the heavens. "I sent three boats to save you! You want I should do more?"
So, OK, it was prayer that saved the hostages. God, they say, moves in mysterious ways His wonders to perform. So, OK, he sent the British SAS in answer to the hostages' prayer. Is it still so hard to just say a simple "thank you?"
0230 GMT March 24, 2006
Did Russian Ambassador Give Saddam US War Plans? asks ABC News. In which case the answer has to be no, because the Russians did not know American war plans.
What the report refers to, ignoring the sloppy headline, is that according to documents seized in Iraq that are now being declassified and made available to the public on President Bush's orders, the Russians may have given Iraq information on US deployments.
Big yawn. The Iraqis could have got most of that information from the US press had they bothered. Russia's cooperation with Iraq was close and continued right to the fall of Baghdad, after which there was no Iraq government to deal with. None of this is any secret to anyone except ABC.
US Military Deaths Less under Bush II Than Reagan Mike Thompson forwards an interesting figure. During Ronald Reagan's first term in office, 9163 military personnel died in service; in President Bush's first term, 5187. No figures later than 2004 are as yet available.
The military was, of course, about 50% bigger in Reagan's time. That the Bush II figures are considerably lower despite the Iraq War (784 dead in 2004) is, we found on checking, because of remarkable reductions in non-combat deaths in every category including accidents, homicides, illness, and suicides. In 1981, for example, 1555 servicepersons died in accidents. In 2004 it was 565.
Admittedly this is one of those "neither here nor there" figures because without the Iraq War US military deaths would have been in the 4400 range.
UK Special Air Service Rescues Hostages On information received from a detainee, who Times London says had been under surveillance for several days, a British special forces team rescued 3 hostages belonging to a peace-activist group held in a Baghdad house.
The British troops belong to a special 250 man joint UK-US-Australia special forces task groups. The group had been looking for these particular westerners for months - and presumably looking for other hostages too.
Times says the operation, which was meticulously planned and rehearsed - the rescuers had reconnaissance pictures including from a Predator - took exactly two minutes and the kidnappers escaped.
We had a few giggles over that. The paper describes how 25 men stormed every room simultaneously to ensure no one escaped. Now, it's possible none of the captors was in the house - but how likely is that? The house as under surveillance: the newspaper does not say anyone was observed leaving.
In accordance with sensible procedure, SAS shoots every bad guy on sight: there is no "get down on the floor you blankety blanks" such as we see in the movies. The troops are trained not to take any chances, the hostages were white, their captors not, so there would be no question of lining up people to check who was a hostage and who was a captor, and in these situations the only way to be sure you aren't asking for trouble is to kill the other people.
Christian Group Does Not Thank Coalition For Rescuing Hostages The peace activists belong to a group opposed to US-UK policy in Iraq, but we do think they are being a tad ungracious: instead of a thank you for the rescue, the Coalition got another blast about the illegal occupation being the cause of the insecurity which led to the kidnapping and so on and so forth.
Our reaction: Roll of the Eyes. Its not insecurity that led to the kidnapping, it's a desire for ransom money. And the missionaries themselves were there because of the illegal occupation: no illegal occupation, no visa to visit/live in Iraq as foreigners were not welcome. There's several carts and horses chasing each other around here.
By the way, one of the hostages had insisted he did not want to be rescued by the military. We wouldn't at all be surprised if the British politely apologized to him for ruining his day.
Pakistan Says "Taliban" Killed In Afghanistan Were Civilians on a festival visit to relatives and that the local Afghan commander killed them as part of a blood feud. His brother had been killed by members of the same tribe.
What we'd like to know is, why were these civilians traveling at night? The border between Afghanistan and Pakistan is open to night traffic? And people cheerfully drive around at night? Sounds odd. Its not even clear to us the people crossed the border legally.
The Afghan governor of the province concerned has said his information is the men were criminals and had entered Afghanistan in furtherance of their illegal activities.
Israeli Right Wing Party Asks Israeli Arabs To Leave OK, so this is another nut-case party with a fruitcake idea, but the story has an interesting twist. The party, Herut, was asking for Arab votes so that it can win - and then give money to Israeli Arabs to leave Israel.
The Jerusalem Post story makes very clear the local Israelis are upset with the right-wing party and its attack on their Arab-origin neighbors.
0230 GMT March 23, 2006
Afghans Kill 15 Taliban as the insurgents crossed the border from Pakistan. We note these border interceptions are becoming more numerous and more effective, suggesting both improved border surveillance and better intelligence on Pakistani border areas.
There is a possibility the dead were not genuine insurgents but involved in the drug trade.
Murdered UK MPs Had No Communication With Base The inquest into the deaths of 6 British Army MPs at the hands of Iraqi insurgents in 2003 reveals they had no satellite telephone link - the officer immediately above the men said he was under the impression none were available. The men, sent by themselves to help look after several police stations could only communicate using 1960s vintage equipment.
This is absolutely sickening. No wonder the families of the men are getting more enraged as the inquest proceeds.
Gambia Coup Foiled Reuters says the head of the military has fled and 10 officers in custody on suspicion of plotting a military coup. The present head of state himself came to power after a 1994 coup, though he is about to hold elections for a 3rd time since then.
British Letter Calling For Iran Military Action "Leaked" The letter, by a foreign office bureaucrat, was sent to his counterparts in US, Germany, and France. It proposes the west tell China/Russia to get on board with an Chapter 7 referral - which if approved by the Security Council clears the way for military action, but agree to further talks and face-saving formulas for Iran. In effect this means giving diplomacy another chance but with a Chapter 7 referral to convince Iran the matter is serious.
The Chinese and Russians want it the other way around: more diplomacy - futile in our opinion - and only if that fails then a Chapter 7 should be considered.
The US approach is "No negotiations before Chapter 7, no negotiations after Chapter 7, just clobber them".
So here we have the bad copy - US, followed by the good cop - UK, and the whole thing conveniently leaked so that the Iranians, Chinese, and Russians get the idea.
US Dismissive Of Iran Talks Offer and sees it as an attempt to divert attention from an impending N-program showdown.
Personally, we agree. The news that Iran wanted talks with the US because the instability in Iraq was worrying it made little sense since Iran can achieve its objectives in Iraq only through instability.
Our attitude on hearing the news was, well we surely don't know everything, and maybe the Iranians are worried about instability. This is seeming less and less likely to us. So what's the deal on the talks?
Our take - always subject to revision as more information arrives is: 1. The talks were suggested by a big time Shia cleric, US obviously thought it impolitic to say "no" regardless of what it thought. 2. As far as the Iran hardliners are concerned, this is a welcome diversion. 3. What's more interesting is why Iran moderates went along with, or got their pal in Iraq to propose, the idea of talks.
Our guess - and it is only a guess at this time - is they're looking to establish channels of communication with the US and have decided this is the best way of doing it, as opposed to - say - clandestine contacts.
UK "Supreme Court" Upholds Ban on Hijab At School The House of Lords, which functions as UK's Supreme Court, allowed a school's appeal banning a female student from wearing full-body covering clothes. Her case was her religion required the full covering.
The Lords noted the school was 75% Muslim and the head was a Muslim; it has gone to "extraordinary" lengths to devise a uniform acceptable to the parents/students and there had been no problems before this. [Editor: The uniform is the traditional South Asian salwar-kameez: baggy pants and full-sleeved, high neck shirt. This covers all parts of the body except for the face and hands. The hair can be covered by a duppata, a length of cloth which South Asian girls/women wear as a reversed scarf, i.e., the duppata is worn around the neck but the end dangles at the back. Girls/women use it as a head covering, and also as a makeshift veil the face at need.]
The school said, and the Lords accepted, that if an exception was made for the student, other parents/students could ask for exceptions and the school would end up with no policy on uniforms.
Few US schools have uniforms - we wouldn't want to get in the way of our little darlings expressing their individuality. As a school-teacher your editor feels his girl little darlings wear far too little. His boy little darlings wear too much: clothes that are several sizes too big, not to mention the uninvited view of their boxers as their pants hang on their lower waists. Students with more money make their superior economic status very clear and this should not be happening, particularly at an age children are very conscious about money and status.
And before you ask, yes it did happen in Washington, once that we know of. A youngster fleeing the authorities tripped and became entangled in his own pants after they fell to his knees as he ran.
0230 GMT March 22, 2006
Looney Tuners Continue Inexorable March We must make clear we have nothing against prominent people being idiots. We have a lot against people who are boring idiots. And today's news, unfortunately, is about boring idiots. Our thanks to Mike Thompson among others for alerting us.
Child of Swans says that DPRK now has an ability to preempt the US, and if the US knows what's good for it, it will enter into an agreement with DPRK like it has with India. For starters, India has not threatened anyone with N-weapons, not even its adversaries, and then demanded an agreement with the US. Next, the N-agreement with India is just one of many that is being signed between two parties who have become allies. Last, regardless of what US sources say, DPRK's preemptive capability is a fantasy.
Hugo Latin Revolutionary says if the US attacks Venezuela, all of Latin America's revolutionaries will come to Venezuela's support. How many times does Hugo have to be told? US is not interested in invading you. It has neither the intent, nor the capability, nor the time. There are thousands of things of greater concern: who will be the finalists in the basketball championship, what Apple's new video I-Pod will look like, who Paris Hilton's next boyfriend will be - do you get the idea, Hugo? The US has a life. You don't. Take a hint from orbat.com's editor, who also doesn't have a life. Go play with your rubber duckies or something, just don't bore us to death.
Red Ken Of London Towne manages to boot himself in the rear again. Already in trouble for gross anti-Semitic remarks he made to a correspondent for no reason anyone has been able to determine, Red Ken, Mayor of London has now said two developers he is scrapping with should go back to Iran and see how they like life under the ayotollahs if they don't like the way things are done in London - meaning the way he does things in London. Go back to Iran why? They happen to be Britishers of Indian Jewish origin and have nothing to do with Iran. Hint to readers: Red Ken, so called because he thinks he is a leftie, is a British "Intellectual", you know, the people who are so superior in their "intelligence" compared to the hapless Mr. George Bush?
More Critical World News In case you thought "I am a victim" was an America Only syndrome, here is news from UK, thanks to the London Times. The deputy head of a school is giving evidence before a labor tribunal that she was sexual harassed because no one would give a new chair to replace the one she had.
Her chair apparently - um - "farted" when she sat in it. She asked for a new one, the men working with her got new ones but not she. She spent a lot of time explaining to visitors to her office it was the chair and not her.
She was so despondent that she wanted to commit suicide.
The head teacher said there had been a delivery of chairs and they expected the deputy head would pick it up herself.
US Prosecuting Vietnam Deserters This story, also from London Times, is interesting. Apparently US authorities are arresting Vietnam era deserters after years of having ignored the matter. The military says it has nothing to do with Iraq because of which, it is thought, 3000 servicemen a year have deserted since 2003 - a bit lower than normal. It is not trying to send a message to current deserters, just doing its job.
Well, the military is lying and should be held to account for NOT arresting deserters all these years, especially as many seem to have been living in full sight. In case our foreign friends are confused: the US granted an amnesty to draft evaders after the Vietnam War ended. Desertion is a a very much more serious crime.
0230 GMT March 21, 2006
Former CIA Man Says 2-Days Needed To Wipe Our Iran N-Program This is from the officer who led the search for Osama in 2001. He tells Jerusalem Post between 15-30 targets need to be attacked, and believes US anti-bunker bombs will kill the hardened underground targets.
Earlier Richard Perle, a former Administration national security official, had said the attack could be conducted in one night using the B-2 force alone.
A lot of this sort of talk is in too general terms to be of interest to us. We've said the anti-N-program attack is much easier than people think because the great majority of targets associated with the program do not need to be hit. The 300 target figure comes from adding up every factory, every university lab, every base etc.
At the same time, we've noted the problem is not the N-facilities attack, it is the need to preempt Iranian action against oil targets. Its still perfectly feasible, but it isn't going to be done in one night or two. Weeks is a better working figure.
What we find interesting is the CIA gentleman's assertion that Iran should not count on Mr. Bush's weakened position to assume it will escape an attack. The ex-official says Mr. Bush will move after the 2006 mid-term election, and will not concern himself about domestic opposition. Many people believed he would not attack Iraq, but he did, and he is serious about disarming Iran.
We have speculated Mr. Bush's weakness will inhibit an attack. The official does have a point: Mr. Bush tends to push on regardless on issues he believes in strongly regardless of opposition.
The official believes the Iranians are going to misjudge the US. We agree. They already are: Teheran has convinced itself the US is so frightened of $100/barrel oil it will not move against Iran. In our humble opinion about the last thing the US will worry about is the price of oil.
Also, the one thing people forget about the Americans: when they are in a real fight and lots of things are being blown up they get hugely thrilled regardless of what they believed before the fight. If things don't go well later, they get remorseful. But is that any comfort to Saddam? Similarly, dear Iranian leaders, let it not be of comfort to you.
US To Hold Arabian Sea Naval Exercises in May this year. Codenamed Arabian Gauntlet the exercise will simulate - surprise, surprise (not) the Iranians mining the Straits of Hormuz and trying to attack US naval units with swarms of explosive laden boats. The latter is a lost strategy before it is launched: the US is not going to have a single warship within reach of Iranian suicide boats.
Two things to remember. Blocking tanker traffic in the Arabian (Persian) Gulf has been tried before, by Iraq during the war with Iran. Iran retaliated and clashed several times with the US Navy. The effort was a complete failure. Of course, Iran has a better ability to close Hormuz than the Iraqis had to stop tanker traffic. But western capabilities in the Arabian Gulf have grown manifold since the Iran-Iraq war. This will not be Iran against the US: it will be Iran against the rest of the world because everyone will be hit by reduced oil supplies - the US ironically least of all.
Also, while we don't have the figures yet: sinking ships in the 3-km shipping channel does not mean the Straits get closed. That tactic can create problems for the deep draught supertankers. Smaller tankers will get through fine and, depending on their size/draught, will be able to operate outside the channel.
Belmont Club has a nice discussion at http://belmontclub.blogspot.com/2005/03/hormuz-austin-bay-discusses.html It quotes the US DIA Director as saying Iran could close the Straits - "briefly".
Pricing Drug Hauls BBC says Ecuador has seized 2,700 kg of cocaine worth $540-million at street price. The haul came from a Mexico bound ship, so presumably it was for the US.
A quick search did not give us 2006 prices. The 2003 US street price according to the United Nations http://www.unodc.org/pdf/WDR_2005/volume_2_chap7_cocaine.pdf was $77/gram. In March 2006 street price varied from $20/gram in New York to $80/gram in Los Angeles. The wholesale price was $21,500/kilo in 2003.
Thus, the shipment is worth less than $60-million wholesale.
The issue of price is not a big deal: it makes no difference if law enforcement people want to make themselves look good by inflating prices. Given the profit margin, a whole lot of people would be quite happy to smuggle cocaine even if officials used realistic prices. Nonetheless, we thought we'd check the prices.
By the way, US with 4.5% of the world population is thought to consume 60% of smuggled drugs. Its no wonder Islamic fundamentalists think the US is on the verge of collapse and all it needs is a little push from them.
Big mistake, brothers, as you have found. Big mistake. The degree of sex, alcohol, drugs, pornography, crime etc in a society like the US has no impact at all on its fighting ability. We at orbat.com often make mistakes too. But we try and avoid mistakes that end up with us being dead. Live and let live, brothers. Otherwise Sam will kill you. And frankly, we for sure think its not a bad thing.
Major Holders of US Treasury Bonds are Japan ($644-billion), PRC ($263-billion), and UK ($242-billion). The total held overseas is about $2200-billion. Figures are for March 15, 2006, from US Treasury.
OPEC, oddly enough, owns only $78-billion. In part this has to be because until very recently OPEC was spending money nearly as fast as it was making it. Nonetheless, one has to wonder if OPEC members fear trouble with relying too much on US Treasuries. Japan's holdings are accounted for, in large part, its massive financing of its social security programs against the day Japan becomes a country of the aged.
Some Chinese economists says their country's forex reserves are way too large and all that China is doing is providing Washington with cheap funds. They argue China needs to reduce its forex reserves by two-thirds, which would require a massive sell off of US assets.
0230 GMT March 20, 2006
Largest Iran Reform Party Calls For N-Talks with the west and proposes a freeze on N-activity.
This is all well and good, but haven't we been there before? There were talks for 2 years, there were suspensions of N-weapons work, nothing came of them; Iran was referred to the UN Security Council which is trying to figure out a line of action. So what would be the point of more talks? If Iran is willing to give up its N-weapons program, then there's a point to talks. Otherwise, whatever the intent of the reformers, their proposal will simply mean another waste of time.
UK's Jack Straw Bells the Cat by saying after Iran's N-program is taken care of, discussions will have to start on Israel's bomb. according to Jerusalem Post, Israel has decided to play it cool and to offer no reaction to Mr. Straw's comments.
Well, Mr. Straw has a valid point, and Israel already has a security guarantee from the US. Bringing Israel into NATO should give the Israelis confidence enough to abandon N-weapons. At which point, of course, the Arabs freak out because Israel is now part of NATO.
The larger issue, however, of why 5 countries should have N-weapons and no one else is not being addressed by the 5 countries. If the 5 agreed to dismantle their arsenals under international verification, no one else would have any justification for keeping theirs. But telling people like Iran, Israel, and India "you have to give up your weapons while we keep ours" is not, in the long run, a workable proposition.
So, if Mr. Straw really wants to prove his bonafides to the Iranians, he should call not just for discussion about Israel, but also about the UK.
Hamas Government Has No Terrorist Ministers says Jerusalem Post. Moreover, the man in charge of security forces - which are controlled by Fatah, which in turn has refused to put its forces under Hamas - is known to have a working relationship with Fatah.
OK, a good start. Now can we hear Hamas say it renounces terror even if it won't recognize Israel? If the new government would commit to that, everything else is pointless and the reality remains: you have an announced bunch of terrorists running a country.
Pakistan: More Trouble We're wondering if Jang of Pakistan has been saving up the bad news because there is a powerful lot of it.
Six security personnel were killed by a remote bomb in the Northwest Frontier Province. Two soldiers were killed in the same area by a grenade attack. Two tribal police in Baluchistan were kidnapped after unknown persons attacked a picnic - we realize this doesn't make much sense but that's what Jang says. There was a big exchange of fire including rockets and so on, as they fled the attackers seized the two policemen.
But this news pales in comparison to the report that hundreds of Taliban have appeared in another border district, Malakand. They have teamed up with local criminals and unleashed a wave of crime, including kidnappings for ransom. The locals have failed to get hostages released, so they are forming a tribal force to go fight the criminals and Taliban. According to Jang, the security forces are nowhere to be seen.
First, we need to let our readers know that Pakistan ISI has partially rebuilt the Taliban. That is why these charming people are back in some force, in Pakistan and in Afghanistan. Pakistan has been handing over Al Qaeda types to the Americans left and right, but nary a Taliban. In fact when the US attacked the Taliban dinner party a few weeks ago Pakistan raised all heck.
Second, their appearance in another district is a serious matter. Tribal districts are very lightly policed as the locals administer their own law. It doesn't take much for an organized bunch of thugs to take over.
We'll have to wait till our South Asia correspondent enlightens us on what is going on here.
US Navy Captures 13 Suspected Pirates The missile cruiser Cape St. George and the missile destroyer Gonzalez captured 13 suspected pirates after an inspection boarding party from the ships was fired on off Somalia. A Somali person says his men were on fisheries protection when the US Navy fired on them.
The US Navy had considerable experience in marine interdiction and it is not the Navy's habit to open fire for no reason.
0230 GMT March 19, 2006
Harvard Study Says Israeli Lobby Hurts US Jerusalem Post says according to a Harvard the Israeli lobby in the US is so powerful it gets the US to act against its own interest. Needless to say, the study has ignited a storm of protest.
First, we must commend the Jerusalem Post for its highly professional reporting. It has given the story impartially, explaining the points made by the authors, and has avoided going into a rant from the second line onward.
Second, we don't understand why any one is upset about the study because to us, as 3rd World types, the conclusions are so obvious that no comment is needed.
We have not seen the study. Nonetheless, no one we personally know has ever said that were the US to abandon Israel America's problems with the Muslims world would end. We've often explicitly said that America's problems with the Muslim world at this time have nothing to do with US support of Israel: the Muslims who hate America would have hated America even if no Israel had existed, simply because the US is the biggest and the baddest boy on the block.
For example, have the Arabs ever given America even a hint of appreciation at the way President Eisenhower forced the British and French to call off the seizure of the Suez Canal in 1956? Anyone have anything to say about the Americans helping FRY Muslims to win their independence? The Arab indifference in particular, and the Islamic indifference in general, to the plight of the Palestinians is too well known to repeat: Israeli mistreatment of the Palestinians is no justification for what people like Osama are doing.
At the same time, American support of Israel often comes at so high a cost that no other interest group could continue to bend American policy the way the pro-Israel lobby does. Anyone want to tabulate the money the US has had to give Israel to stay alive, not to say give to Egypt and Jordan for the peace with Israel? Anyone care to apportion what percentage of the US decision to invade Iraq 2003 was because the elimination of Saddam - and the expected subsequent removal of Syria - would help Israel? And in return for all that money Israel has done what for the US?
But: look, people. The Jews who migrated to America were highly educated. They quickly established themselves and became extremely successful in terms of money. Their intelligence and hard work led them to important positions in the government/academia from where they could influence policy. Their love for their brethren led them to pour money into influencing US decision makers and policing the media to ensure the best treatment for Israel and the worst for Arabs.
So they have an influence on US foreign policy out of all proportion to their numbers. But then that's the way life is. Rich people have more power than poor people, and its got nothing to do with religion or ideology or whatever. You cant beat up the Jews for being successful at what they do, in this case at influencing US policy even against American interests.
America is a free country. You don't like the influence of the Jewish lobby, no one is stopping you from setting up your own lobby or making your existing lobby more efficient.
0230 GMT March 18, 2006
US-UK Open New Front Against Iran Jang of Pakistan reports that Iran has said Afghan "bandits" with ties to the US and UK staged an ambush critically wounding the governor of Zahedan, a major town in Sistan-Baluchistan, and killing 22 others. A number of others have apparently been seized as hostages, the Iranians are waiting for details. The "bandits" set up a fake police checkpoint for the operation.
We have earlier mentioned Iranian Baluch insurgents working out of Pakistani Baluchistan.
Our South Asia correspondent, Mandeep Singh Bajwa, alerts us to intensive efforts by the UK to penetrate Iranian Khuzistan, where most of the oil fields are located. There have been continued bombing and sabotage incidents.
We wholly support these actions to the extent they are aimed at legitimate regime targets and not at civilians. Iran has for years now been financing, arming, and manning insurgency in Lebanon and Palestine; its activities in Iraq are no secret. Its time the Iranian regime got a taste of its own medicine.
US-Iran To Discuss Iraq Iran, saying it is following up on the request of a prominent Iraqi Shia politician, called for talks on Iraq with the US. Washington warns the talks may be an attempt to divert attention from the N-issue; nonetheless, the US ambassador to Iraq has been authorized to talk to the Iranians.
BBC says the Iranians are just as worried about Iraq spinning out of control as the Americans (what's the problem, Teheran? Sadr The Slimeball not listening to you anymore? Are you surprised?). Therefore, despite major differences, the US and Iran can gain from talks. These will be the first official contacts between the two countries since 1979. The US has made it clear there will be no discussion of the N-issue.
The Iranians pride themselves on their ability to deceive the west; they are about to learn a sad, sad truth about the Americans. The masters of deceit are not the Iranians, but the Americans. And the Americans will stick it to the Iranians completely within the framework of any agreement, formal or informal, that is reached.
US To Hand Over 75% Of Iraq Control By End-Summer says the US second-in-command in Iraq (story from NPR). As a general rule, the US regards one Iraqi brigade the equal of one US battalion in the counterinsurgency. In theory, then, by late summer the US should be able to drawn down 10 brigades total, because the 10 Iraqi divisions should be fully combat capable. Of course, that's 10 brigades from the peak force of about 17-18 brigades. That will leave 7-8 US brigades in Iraq for the rest of the year and into 2007.
Syrians Form Opposition Front In Exile Baby Assad may need to loosen his natty tie and jacket, things just got hotter. Jerusalem Post reports that six exile opposition groups meeting in Brussels have formed a front for national salvation, and have called for a transitional government to take over Syria for six months at the appropriate time. The first elements of the platform have been announced: ending the 1963 state of emergency and release of all political prisoners.
0230 GMT March 17, 2006
Saddam Trial May Be Drawing To An End We're surprised at this news but it appears most of the major witnesses have said their piece and the defendants have had their chance at cross-examination. It's already being said that there may be no more Saddam trials: if he is found guilty for the Dujail massacre he has to be executed in 30 days and that will be the end of the story. About time, too.
The trial is adjourned for three weeks.
Pressure on Palestine Authority To Resign Grows after the seizure by Israel of six prisoners who were going to be set free. The apparent helplessness of the PA police in failing to put up resistance against the Israelis and the worldwide media images of PA police stripped to their briefs with their hands cuffed has upset Palestinians.
Its easy for those that weren't at the receiving end of the Israeli Army to talk about failing to put up resistance. Apart from kidnapping a whole lot of western aid workers who are there to help the Palestine people, we don't see these fierce resistors doing anything beyond yak yak yak.
The police and prisoners surrendering to the Israeli Army at Jericho prison were ordered to strip before approaching soldiers as a precaution against explosives.
Meanwhile, President Abbas continues with his completely pointless accusations about the British and Americans colluding with the Israelis to seize the prisoners. How is it, he asks, that ten minutes after the foreign monitors left the jail the Israelis attacked?
Well, lets go over this using idiot language, Mr. Abbas. For days it was apparent that you were preparing to release the prisoners, violating the agreement your predecessor, the illustrious Mr. Arafat, had made in exchange for his freedom. The Israelis, British, and Americans knew about your impending decision as discussions were taking place in public. Next, the monitors received warning they were about to be seized by Palestinians as a prelude to the release of the prisoners. In accordance with long-standing, carefully rehearsed plans made urgent by your impending decision, the monitors immediately withdrew, giving you 10-minutes warning. They also warned the Israelis, as they were required to do. The Israelis were standing by, they moved in.
The crux of the matter, Sir, is that your lot as about as close to the Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight as we're likely to get anywhere in the world. Since everything the Palestinians do seems to be preceded by days and hours of chest thumping and strutting, and since in any case your administration is completely infiltrated by the Israelis, all that happened is the Israelis moved faster than the Palestinians.
End of the story. Instead of blaming the Americans and British, blame yourself for clearly saying you would not oppose the "will of the people" or some similar rot over the release.
We used to have a lot of sympathy for you and in these columns have defended you, saying that your power was limited by the ever-present threat of assassination by one terrorist group or another. Our problem has become that you have long shown yourself to be ineffective - and we are not blaming you one bit. In your position, we'd have quit and hightailed it to Paris or wherever. The problem is you still insist on clinging to office for the benefits it brings you [wink wink nod nod]. If you are to regain the relative honesty for which you were respected, you need to do exactly what the terrorists are telling you to do: resign.
Baluch Insurgents Cause Major Blackouts in several districts including Quetta City by blowing up a power pylon and apparently damaging others. Power to Quetta was restored fairly soon by rerouting, but it will take a week for repairs to be made.
By which time the insurgents will have blown up something else.
US Deficit Financing Limit Raised to $9-Trillion to avoid default on Treasury bills coming due. $3-trillion of that deficit has been accumulated on President Bush's watch. That puts the US public debt to GDP ratio on its way to approaching 75% within a year, which is about the average for Latin America. But Latin America's ratio is falling, the US's is increasing.
The debt as of yesterday was $8.2 trillion; when Mr. Bush took office is was $5.6 trillion. Expect about $11 trillion debt on a GDP of $13-trillion (all round figures) by the time Mr. Bush retires. The further problem is that when Mr. Bush took office in January 2001, the US was projected to generate a $5.6 trillion surplus by 2011 - we're not sure how, we got the figure from a US Congressional Budget Office source. In September 2004 the US was instead expected to be in deficit of $3.5 trillion over that period, or $9 trillion down. Its going to be a lot more, of course.
If you want to know why Republicans are mad at their leader, look no further.
We've said this before: you can't build a world empire if your economy is not strong. We don't care what the economic pundits say, you don't have a strong economy when you are approaching banana republic status with the National Debt. This is a national security issue as much as the Terror War.
Reader Dean M. Brunkhardt Not Impressed By China Rail I must take exception with just how much better China is than the US when it comes to rail technology.
Simply put: Mass transportation is socialism; owning your own car is capitalism. Riding the bus or train means you are on someone else's schedule and reliant on them. With a car, you can get up and go whenever you like.
Although car ownership in China is increasing (based on the TV shots I see of major cities) I'll wager that bikes, walking, and attaching trailers to a beast of burden are still the main mode of transportation, especially in the hinterlands. A spiffy new rail system, while headline grabbing, masks the harsh reality most Chinese people still face: walking or riding a bike.
America, when people live in poverty, they own a car, a TV, and have basic living conditions met. And yes, they still can ride the light rail.
0230 GMT March 16, 2006
Finally, A Plan For Iraq Exit It may have come too late to save the President's sinking popularity ratings, but at least the US has finally articulated a sensible plan both for measuring progress in Iraq and for its exit. The yardstick will be percentage of Iraq over which the Iraqis have control for their security. Once it gets to 50% US can start pulling troops out.
That doesn't mean US troops won't be needed in the areas the Iraqis control. And it doesn't mean everyone is happy with the yardstick. Some are saying the percentage is irrelevant because its Baghdad and the Sunni majority provinces that are highly insecure.
Nonetheless, at least there is a yardstick instead of the vague "we don't want to comfort the enemy so all we'll say is we're ready to stay as long as neccessary", a stand that led to the uncomfortable suspicion there was no plan.
It has to be acknowledged that while much has gone wrong since the Samarra Mosque bombing, the Iraq Army is progressing rapidly. At least as far as we know, the Sunni-Shia divide has not hit the Army, which is doing a sterling job. We do hope people realize that given the situation, a bigger Army is needed, at least 250,000 troops, or 15 divisions instead of the 10 that was the target - and which has been reached.
We're trying to recall who it was that warned, when the Anbar tribes turned against al Qaeda and foreigners, that since Anbar was no longer safe for the terrorists, they would hit Baghdad. That is exactly what has happened. And the reason it has happened is the same old, same old: not enough troops. More on this another time.
"Iran Central Banker for Terrorism" says Rice She said this in Australia, according to Associated Press. We're unsure what to make of her announcement. It happens to be true, but the US has never previously before used such strong language.
Separately, in a move opposed by the administration, the US House Foreign Relations Committee voted 37-3 to end economic aid to any country investing in Iran's energy sector. It is expected to pass a full house vote.
Though the measure contains exceptions in case the administration says they are in the national interest, the US government says that the vote will hamper conduct of US foreign policy. To quote an administration official: "the legislation would "create tensions with countries whose help we need in dealing with Iran and shift the focus away from Iran's actions and spotlight differences between us and our allies."
The House, however, says that the matter is urgent. Of course, should it also pass the Senate the measure will be vetoed by the President, but the House Committee's action highlights the difficulties the President has in running his foreign policy.
Religious School in Miranshah Demolished by Pakistan security forces, says Jang of Pakistan. As usual, the Pakistan Government has to disagree, and says it was only a house used by terrorists.
Security forces had earlier attacked and destroyed buildings housing two rebel clerics responsible for attacks against security forces in the area.
But: just to show how totally useless reporting from Pakistan is, there is now a report that one of the clerics has barred his followers from attacking the Pakistan security force within a radius of 25-km from Miranshah. An earlier attack against a post 12 km from town is said to be the work of elements not under his control.
How is anyone supposed to make any sense of all these contradictions, and why do these major developments simply pop up without warning in the middle of press reports? Has this cleric decided on a truce with the security forces after being battered by gunships and artillery? Did he mean to get involved in the attack on Miranshah in the first place, or was he not involved? No one who is reporting seems to have a clue.
China To Build New MagLev Rail Line We honestly take no pleasure in these stories about how China is doing something else groundbreaking. They make the US look pathetic, but reality has to be faced. In the US the rich are determined to save every last dollar from tax so they can spend it on themselves (they call it "investing to create jobs", the problem being the jobs seem to pay minimum wage while making more fortunes for the rich) and so there is no public money for investments like high speed rail. US infrastructure in general is in terrible shape, but we all got used to having the Europeans outdo us in this arena. Now the Chinese, who are a poor country by any measure, are outdoing us. Ah, but no one produces entertainment like America. Quite right, so lets watch the latest context on our I-Pod Mini TV screens as we chug along in Amtrack trains, which are vestiges of some previous century, may be the 17th or even the 15th, while the Chinese float on their MagLev lines.
This new one is to be built linking Shanghai with Hangzhou, 106 miles southwest - apparently through a hi-tech corridor. It will be a $4 billion extension of the Transrapid, the world's first commerical MagLev line which runs 19 miles to Shanghai International Airport. Though trains have hit 310 mph (500 kph) in tests, the run will be made at 270 mph.
Meanwhile. China is also building a new Shanghai-Beijing rail line, using conventional technology to cover the 820 mile distance in 5 hours as opposed to the current 13. The trains will travel at 220 mph.
0230 GMT March 15, 2006
Israelis Storm Jericho Prison and capture six terrorists that were about to be released by the Palestinians in contravention of agreements with the US, UK, and Israel. The six had originally been in Israeli custody, but under the US brokered 2002 accord that ended Israel's siege of Arafat's compound, they were transferred to Palestine custody. International monitors were stationed at the jail to ensure they were not moved.
After Hamas came to power, it said it was going to free the men; President Abbas said he would not oppose the move. The monitors left, the Israelis moved in, and after some fighting in which two PA policemen were killed and others wounded, the six surrendered.
The above shows the big problem of dealing with the Palestinians. If agreements are to be made only when it is advantageous to do so, and broken when it is not advantageous to do, what is their word worth? Precisely nothing.
Serb Dictator Had Not Been Taken Prescribed Medicine Apparently aside from the unauthorized use of an antibiotic which would negate his blood-pressure medicine, Mr. Milosevic had been caught earlier not taking his medicine in the first place.
Pakistan Starts Expelling Afghans From Waziristan This was to be expected after the trouble with Taliban and al Qaeda fighters sheltering in Pakistan. At the same time, many of the Afghans now liable for expulsion are simply ordinary people who came as refugees, and grown up, married, and settled down in Pakistan. As a practical matter it is very hard for Pakistan to say which Afghan falls in which category. The government's writ never ran in the border areas to begin with. On top of that the refugee flow was unregulated.
Violence continues in Baghdad, 72 die in 24 hours After the Samarra Mosque bombing, the only time when Baghdad is peaceful if when vehicular curfews are imposed.
Meanwhile, the US Joint Chiefs of Staff says he cannot prove that Iran is behind the shipment of the new heavy duty IEDs that are being used and a shipment of which was intercepted at the border. It was traced to an Iranian factory after an analysis of the welds.
General Pace's legalistic talk is irritating. Even Rummy said he had no proof. So are we to assume that Iran is in a state of such anarchy that non-governmental types can order IEDs from a private factory and ship them to Iraq without the government knowing? Odd, because everything we hear from Iran is that it is a rather efficient police state.
At the same time, after the WMD fuss, what else are General Pace and Rummy to say except that Iran is innocent unless proven otherwise, lest they be accused of hyping the threats. Assuming the Iranians are not complete idiots, the matter can never be proved.
Africa's Internet Access Problems The Sat3 cable which connects Europe to Western and Southern Africa and then to Asia was supposed to provide Africa - "the land the Internet forgot" - with Internet service. An extension to East Africa is to be completed next year. But the promise has not been fulfilled - Internet is available, at so high a price it is unaffordable for all except a few.
The reason, says BBC, is that 19 of 24 companies that have signed up for Sat3 are incumbent operators almost all owned by governments, and likely can exercise monopolize availability. Thus, while Sat3 costs are $2000/month for 1 MB/second traffic, the Sat3 operator has been charging as high as $25,000/month, though current rates are $10-15,000/month.
[Something here is not adding up. Sat3 started with a 20 GB/second capability and cost $650-million according to http://www.cto-ict.org/index.php?dir=08&sd=30&partner=telkom_sa, a Commonwealth organization. The cable has a life of 25-years. The cable cannot cost $480-million a year to operate.]
Sat3's initial 20 GB/second capacity [5.4 million phone calls] has already been doubled to 40 GB/second. The cable has a maximum capacity of 120 GB/second.
But even then, poor old Africa remains in the cold. In 2004, for example, one project of many that involved India had a capacity of 5.12 Terabits [India-Singapore cable] just to serve Indian companies using Singapore as a Pacific base of operations. Another India project under way involved a cable with a top capacity of over 11 Terabits.
The Internet has proven crucial to the spread of democracy and a vital tool in exposing the misdeeds of governments. Something has to be done about Africa's Internet access.
0230 GMT March 14, 2006
· Serb Dictator and Poison He suffered from high blood pressure and had had two heart attacks. Apparently he had been taking unauthorized medicine, a powerful antibiotic used to treat leprosy and TB. The antibiotic hypes up the liver, rapidly washing out other substances, in this case the anti-high-blood-pressure- medicine he was prescribed.
· The plan seems to have been to make himself sick and be sent to Russia for treatment - something he had been demanding. Once there the Russians, who are sheltering his family, would have made sure he stayed for "treatment".
· A very stupid plan, and shame on the Russian government for supporting it and the bloody dictator.
· So in the end it may turn out that Milosevic was right: someone was indeed poisoning him, i.e., Mr. Milosevic himself.
· As to how he got the medicine: Mr. Milosevic seems to have been subjected to light security. He was kept segregated from other Balkan defendants, but had his own cell and his own office - to which he had a key. He was permitted conjugal visits. As they say, connect the dots.
· Saddam Revolutionary Court Judge Says He Signed Execution Orders for the 148 accused of conspiring to kill Saddam and he acted within the law. A proper trial took place; accused had lawyers. The prosecution says no trial took place.
· So, unsurprisingly, the judge kept pressing the witness: did you really actually try all 148? Accused: Yes. Judge: How did you fit so many in court? Accused: those who did not fit in the cage were allowed to stand outside. Judge: But how did you try so many people in two weeks? Accused: they confessed to acting at Iran's behest. Judge: Are you saying all 148 participated in the shooting? Accused: The confessions were confirmed.
· The prosecutor repeatedly asked: How could 148 people have appeared before the court when some had already died during interrogation, according to intelligence documents? Accused repeatedly said: they were all present.
· Finally, the accused threw up his hands and said [from London Times]: "It is so strange and surprising that someone might die in interrogation?"